Corporate Governance and Campaign Finance: Citizens United v. FEC (Introduction)

by J. Robert Brown, for The Race to the Bottom, February 8, 2010.

We don’t ordinarily delve into campaign finance issues but  the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission No. 08–205,  Jan. 21, 2010,merits some unique attention.  As everyone who has not lived under a rock for the last several weeks knows, the Supreme Court largely threw out a provision of McCainFeingold that restricted the right of corporations to expend funds on political campaigns, concluding that the restrictions interfered with the first amendment rights of corporations.

The particular provision at issue did not involve restrictions on corporate contributions to political campaigns or prohibitions on expenditures that expressly advocated the election or defeat of a candidate.  Instead, the case inolved language added in 2002 that prohibited expenses for anything deemed to be an  “electioneering communication.”  The term encompassed communications that referred “to a clearly identified candidate for Federal office” and was made 30 days before a primary or 60 days before a general election. See 2 U. S. C. §441b; see also 2 U. S. C. §434(f)(3)(A).  In short, corporations (and unions) could not pay for communications that referred by name to candidates just before an election…(continue reading)


0 Responses to “Corporate Governance and Campaign Finance: Citizens United v. FEC (Introduction)”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog coordinator

Cefeidas Group



free counters

%d bloggers like this: